Notifications
Clear all

Getting through the DSCR loan maze: My step-by-step and a question

302 Posts
292 Users
0 Reactions
7,648 Views
skybeekeeper
Posts: 5
(@skybeekeeper)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, the random document requests are the worst part. I started keeping a folder on my desktop labeled “weird loan stuff” just to keep up. My lender once flagged a $12 PayPal from my mom for “dog treats”—like, really? I get that they’re being thorough, but sometimes it feels like overkill. My tip: screenshot everything as you go, even if it seems silly. Saves a ton of back-and-forth later.


Reply
Posts: 20
(@blazegamerpro)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Had a client once who had to explain a $7 Venmo labeled “pizza” from his roommate. Underwriters can get super granular—sometimes it’s just their way of checking for undisclosed debts, but yeah, it feels like nitpicking. Screenshotting is a solid move, though.


Reply
scottl54
Posts: 17
(@scottl54)
Eminent Member
Joined:

That "pizza" Venmo story is wild, but honestly, not surprising anymore. I’ve seen underwriters ask about $10 Amazon transfers and even random Zelle payments labeled “thanks.” It does feel nitpicky, but I get that they’re just trying to make sure nothing’s hiding in plain sight.

Screenshotting is a lifesaver, though. I usually tell folks to keep a folder of every little thing—screenshots, explanations, even text threads if it helps clarify. It’s tedious, but it can save a lot of back-and-forth later.

One thing I’ve noticed: sometimes the more you try to over-explain, the more questions pop up. I try to keep explanations short and stick to the facts. “Roommate paid me back for pizza, not a recurring debt”—that’s usually enough. It’s a weird dance, but you’re definitely not alone in feeling like you’re jumping through hoops. Hang in there; it’s a pain, but it does end eventually.


Reply
jennifermetalworker
Posts: 14
(@jennifermetalworker)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I get where you’re coming from about keeping explanations short, but I’ve actually seen it go the other way with a few lenders. Sometimes if you don’t provide enough detail up front, they circle back with even more questions or start making assumptions that aren’t accurate. It’s a bit of a gamble—too much info can open a can of worms, but too little and you’re stuck in email purgatory.

I usually recommend folks include a quick line or two for anything that might look odd, especially if it’s not a regular thing. For example, if you Venmo’d someone for pizza and it’s the only time that month, just add “one-time reimbursement, not ongoing.” That’s saved my clients some headaches. I do agree that screenshotting everything is tedious, but when an underwriter wants clarification on a $12 transfer from three months ago... having it handy is a lifesaver.

It really depends on the lender’s style, though. Some are sticklers, some barely glance at the details. There’s never a perfect formula, but being a little proactive has usually paid off for my clients.


Reply
holly_summit
Posts: 20
(@holly_summit)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Ever notice how some underwriters get hung up on the smallest transfers, while others barely skim the statements? Makes me wonder—do you think it’s worth asking up front what level of detail they want, or does that just flag you as “difficult” right away? I’ve had it go both ways...


Reply
Page 49 / 61
Share:
Scroll to Top