Notifications
Clear all

Buying a Home in 2026? You Might Be Missing a Free $25,000

307 Posts
303 Users
0 Reactions
2,311 Views
frodo_jackson
Posts: 20
(@frodo_jackson)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I get the logic behind the contingency planning, but honestly, even with a 20-30% buffer, I’ve seen costs blow past that in older homes.

“old houses are sneaky”
—that’s putting it mildly. Sometimes you just can’t spreadsheet your way out of structural surprises or code upgrades that weren’t on anyone’s radar. Incentives are nice, but if you’re counting on them to bridge major gaps, it’s risky. I’d argue for being even more conservative with estimates or maybe reconsidering if a full reno is worth it at all, depending on the property.


Reply
Posts: 23
(@diver45)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I hear you—old houses are a total wild card. I budgeted for a 25% buffer on my last place and still got hit with a surprise foundation issue that blew that out of the water. Incentives are cool but yeah, they’re not gonna save you from rotten joists or ancient wiring. Sometimes, walking away is the smarter move, even if that $25k looks tempting on paper.


Reply
Page 62 / 62
Share:
Scroll to Top