Notifications
Clear all

Mortgage rules just got tighter—didn't see that coming

382 Posts
352 Users
0 Reactions
2,014 Views
Posts: 3
(@luckys78)
New Member
Joined:

It's funny you mention that—I've seen underwriters flag the weirdest stuff too. Had a client once who had to explain a series of small payments labeled "Taco Tuesday." Seriously, tacos? Are we really worried someone's running a taco cartel?

But to be fair, I get why they're cautious. With all the fraud and money laundering headlines out there, regulators probably feel they need to tighten the screws somewhere. Still, I can't help but wonder if these overly specific rules actually help catch genuine problems, or if they're just creating a ton of paperwork and headaches for everyone involved. Maybe there's a smarter way to handle this—like better training for underwriters to distinguish between real red flags and harmless everyday transactions?

Has anyone here had an experience where tighter regulations actually uncovered something serious, or is it mostly just nitpicking small stuff?

Reply
vr_sky
Posts: 6
(@vr_sky)
Active Member
Joined:

"Still, I can't help but wonder if these overly specific rules actually help catch genuine problems, or if they're just creating a ton of paperwork and headaches for everyone involved."

I had a similar experience when refinancing our home last year. The underwriter flagged a monthly payment labeled "Book Club," and I had to provide proof it wasn't some shady operation. While it felt excessive at the time, I do appreciate the caution—better safe than sorry. Still, it does seem like resources could be better spent focusing on genuinely suspicious activity rather than harmless hobbies...

Reply
barbara_dreamer4250
Posts: 8
(@barbara_dreamer4250)
Active Member
Joined:

Had something similar happen when we bought our place a few years back. They questioned a recurring payment labeled "Pizza Fund"—literally just our weekly pizza night with friends. Had to send screenshots of Venmo transactions and everything. I get the need for caution, but sometimes it feels like they're chasing shadows instead of actual fraud. Maybe streamlining the process or using better judgment calls could save everyone some headaches...

Reply
Posts: 1
(@shadows59)
New Member
Joined:

"Had to send screenshots of Venmo transactions and everything."

Yeah, I've seen this happen more times than you'd think. It's definitely frustrating when you're just trying to enjoy your pizza night and suddenly you're knee-deep in paperwork. From my experience, lenders are hyper-focused on recurring payments because they're trying to spot hidden debts or obligations that might affect your debt-to-income ratio. Here's what usually helps:

1. Clearly label casual payments with something obviously informal (though "Pizza Fund" seems pretty clear already!).
2. Keep a simple record—screenshots or quick notes—of regular informal transactions leading up to applying for a mortgage.
3. If possible, pause or consolidate these casual payments temporarily during the underwriting process.

I totally agree though, sometimes it feels like they're chasing shadows instead of actual fraud. A little common sense could go a long way here... but until then, staying organized is probably our best bet. Hang in there—once you're past this hurdle, pizza nights at your new place will taste even better.

Reply
gingerw683937
Posts: 3
(@gingerw683937)
New Member
Joined:

"sometimes it feels like they're chasing shadows instead of actual fraud."

Yeah, exactly. When we refinanced last year, they questioned a random $20 Venmo payment labeled "taco Tuesday"... seriously? I get they're trying to be thorough, but there's a line between due diligence and just plain nitpicking. Still, better safe than sorry, I guess. Just brace yourself—there's always one more random request before closing.

Reply
Page 72 / 77
Share:
Scroll to Top