Nobody Talks About ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Nobody Talks About FHA Loans for Disabled Persons—Until Now

323 Posts
312 Users
0 Reactions
4,724 Views
Posts: 22
(@ashley_thompson)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Honestly, I’ve run into lenders asking for the same thing—some even wanted a letter from my doctor saying my disability was “permanent.” It’s like they don’t get how SSDI works or just want to cover themselves. Here’s what’s worked for me: I ask them to show me the exact FHA guideline that requires this “never-ending” proof. Nine times out of ten, they can’t. Usually, the benefits letter and a recent deposit history are enough. If they keep pushing, I’d consider switching lenders. Some just make it harder than it has to be.


Reply
hiker193378
Posts: 22
(@hiker193378)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Yeah, I’ve seen this too. Some lenders just seem to make up extra hoops for no reason. I remember one asking for a “permanent” letter even though my SSDI award letter clearly said ongoing. It’s like they don’t trust the Social Security Administration or something. Honestly, if they can’t point to an actual FHA rule, I’d move on—there are plenty of lenders who know the guidelines and don’t waste your time. Just gotta be persistent and not let them push you around.


Reply
river_thomas
Posts: 19
(@river_thomas)
Active Member
Joined:

It’s like they don’t trust the Social Security Administration or something.

That’s honestly the part that gets me every time. I had a client last year who ran into this exact thing—her SSDI award letter was clear as day, but the lender kept asking for “proof” it wouldn’t expire. We ended up switching lenders because, frankly, it was just wasting everyone’s time.

Here’s what I’ve learned: if a lender starts inventing requirements that aren’t in the FHA handbook, it’s usually a sign they’re either not confident in their own process or they just don’t want to deal with anything outside the box. The FHA guidelines are pretty specific about what counts as acceptable income, and SSDI is definitely on that list as long as you can show it’s ongoing.

If you’re getting pushback, I’d ask them to show you the actual FHA guideline they’re referencing. Nine times out of ten, they can’t. At that point, don’t be afraid to walk away. There are lenders out there who know how to handle these loans without making it harder than it needs to be. Sometimes you just have to keep moving until you find one who gets it.


Reply
Posts: 11
(@pgarcia33)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve seen this too, and it always makes me wonder—are some lenders just not up to speed on the actual FHA rules, or are they just being extra cautious for their own reasons? Has anyone had luck getting a lender to actually admit why they’re so strict about SSDI documentation? Sometimes I feel like it’s less about the guidelines and more about their comfort zone.


Reply
Posts: 18
(@cjohnson31)
Active Member
Joined:

Title: Lenders and FHA Rules—Are They Just Playing It Safe or What?

Sometimes I feel like it’s less about the guidelines and more about their comfort zone.

I’ve wondered the same thing, but I’m not totally convinced it’s just about comfort zones. I mean, sure, some lenders seem to treat FHA rules like they’re written in invisible ink, but I’ve also seen a few who are just terrified of getting dinged in an audit. You ever see a loan officer break into a cold sweat when you mention “HUD review”? It’s like watching someone realize they left the oven on at home.

But here’s the thing—sometimes it really is about their own internal policies, not the actual FHA requirements. I had one lender insist on three years of SSDI award letters (which isn’t even a thing), and when I pushed back with the actual HUD handbook, they just shrugged and said “that’s our policy.” No explanation, just... policy. Makes you wonder if they’re making it up as they go along or if there’s some secret lender club where they swap stories about how strict they can be.

On the flip side, I’ve run into underwriters who are surprisingly chill once you show them the right documentation. Maybe it depends on whether they’ve had bad experiences with buybacks or repurchases? Or maybe some just don’t want to risk their bonus over one file.

Either way, it feels like there’s a lot of “cover your butt” going on. Can’t say I blame them entirely—nobody wants to be the one who let something slip through—but sometimes it borders on ridiculous. Anyone else ever get asked for proof that SSDI checks aren’t Monopoly money? Because that actually happened to me once... still not sure if he was joking.

Anyway, maybe we need a decoder ring for lender policies at this point. Or at least a bingo card for all the extra docs they ask for.


Reply
Page 55 / 65
Share:
Scroll to Top