Notifications
Clear all

Escrow accounts—better through banks or independent services?

192 Posts
183 Users
0 Reactions
2,055 Views
fwhite68
Posts: 14
(@fwhite68)
Active Member
Joined:

Title: Escrow accounts—better through banks or independent services?

Maybe I’m just overthinking it, but peace of mind is worth a lot to me.

I get where you’re coming from, but honestly, I’ve refinanced twice now and gone both routes. Here’s what I noticed:

- Bank-handled escrow: Less hassle, but you pay for the convenience. They roll taxes and insurance in, but I had to chase them once when they paid my property tax late (and I got a penalty notice in the mail). Not fun.
- Independent escrow: More moving parts for sure, but I actually liked having control. Yeah, more emails and signatures, but at least I knew exactly what was happening with my money.

A few things that helped me keep my sanity:
- Made a checklist of every doc and deadline. It sounds obsessive, but it stopped me from second-guessing myself.
- Asked every “dumb” question that popped into my head. The escrow officer probably rolled their eyes, but whatever.
- If you’re worried about missing details, some independent services have online dashboards now. It’s not perfect, but it’s better than the old school way.

I get that peace of mind is valuable, but sometimes the “easy” route isn’t as foolproof as it looks. Banks can drop the ball too. At least with an independent service, you know who to yell at if something goes sideways.

Just my two cents—sometimes a little extra work upfront saves headaches later. But yeah, the back-and-forth can be a pain either way...


Reply
duke_carpenter
Posts: 14
(@duke_carpenter)
Active Member
Joined:

Banks can drop the ball too. At least with an independent service, you know who to yell at if something goes sideways.

Couldn’t agree more—banks aren’t immune to mistakes, and when they do mess up, it’s a headache trying to get someone accountable. One thing I’d add: independent escrow services are often more transparent about their fee structure. Banks sometimes bury little charges in the fine print. If you’re detail-oriented, that extra visibility can be worth the hassle. Just make sure the independent service is bonded and insured—there are a few sketchy operators out there, unfortunately.


Reply
chess672
Posts: 9
(@chess672)
Active Member
Joined:

Had a deal last year where the bank’s escrow department “misplaced” a wire for three days—talk about stress. I get what you mean about transparency; with the independent service I used after that, I could actually get someone on the phone who knew what was going on. But I’ve also heard stories about smaller outfits folding overnight.

Just make sure the independent service is bonded and insured—there are a few sketchy operators out there, unfortunately.
Has anyone here ever had an independent escrow go under mid-transaction? That’s my lingering worry...


Reply
Posts: 5
(@marketing3586783)
Active Member
Joined:

Never had an escrow company actually go belly-up on me mid-deal, but I’ve seen a couple merge or get acquired right in the middle of a transaction—cue the paperwork scramble. Bonded and insured is key, but I still sleep better with the bigger names, even if their hold music is torture.


Reply
fishing_holly
Posts: 14
(@fishing_holly)
Active Member
Joined:

- Had a deal where the escrow company got acquired halfway through closing—total mess. New paperwork, new contacts, lots of waiting around for answers.
- I stick with bank-affiliated escrows if I can. Their systems are slow, but at least they’re not vanishing overnight.
- Independent services can be faster, but I’ve seen them get tripped up by compliance stuff. Makes me nervous.
- Honestly, I’ll take boring and reliable over speedy any day. The risk isn’t worth the headache if something goes sideways.


Reply
Page 15 / 39
Share:
Scroll to Top