Notifications
Clear all

Seller financing vs. lease-to-own: which one actually works better?

197 Posts
189 Users
0 Reactions
1,106 Views
Posts: 3
(@elizabethvlogger)
New Member
Joined:

Title: Seller financing vs. lease-to-own: which one actually works better?

- Gotta push back a bit—seller financing isn’t always smoother, especially if the seller’s not experienced.
- Balloon payments can be a real headache, but I’ve seen some folks negotiate longer terms or even fixed rates to avoid that crunch at the end.
- Lease-to-own gets a bad rap, but with the right contract and clear expectations, it can work for buyers who need time to clean up credit or save more.
- Honestly, both options have their pitfalls... I’ve seen sellers get burned too when buyers walk away after a year or two.
- At the end of the day, it’s all about the details in the contract and making sure everyone’s on the same page from day one.


Reply
cbaker81
Posts: 13
(@cbaker81)
Active Member
Joined:

- Totally agree, the devil’s in the details. I’ve seen seller financing go sideways when the seller’s cousin “handles” the paperwork—never ends well.
- Lease-to-own can be a lifesaver for buyers with rough credit, but man, if the contract’s vague, you’re just asking for drama later.
- Balloon payments? Like a ticking time bomb if you’re not careful. I always tell folks, read every line twice... then read it again.
- Honestly, neither is perfect, but with a solid contract and a little trust, both can work out. Just don’t skip the fine print or you’ll regret it.


Reply
Page 40 / 40
Share:
Scroll to Top