Notifications
Clear all

Seller financing vs. lease-to-own: which one actually works better?

197 Posts
189 Users
0 Reactions
1,130 Views
kevincyclist
Posts: 15
(@kevincyclist)
Active Member
Joined:

I get what you’re saying about life just throwing stuff at people. I’ve refinanced a couple times and even with “standard” mortgages, things can change fast. That’s true for both lease-to-own and seller financing, honestly. You mentioned:

Sometimes lease-to-own attracts people who just need a bit more time to get their ducks in a row.

That really resonates. Not everyone’s ready for the full commitment right away, especially if they’re fixing credit or waiting on a job situation to settle down. I wouldn’t say it’s always a risk—sometimes it’s just practical.

On the paperwork side, seller financing definitely surprised me with how much legal work there was (and I thought I’d done my homework). It’s not as casual as some folks think, and if you’re not careful, it can get messy. But for the right buyer and seller, either option can work out. Just takes patience... and maybe a little luck.


Reply
kathy_jones
Posts: 1
(@kathy_jones)
New Member
Joined:

Honestly, lease-to-own just makes more sense for folks who need flexibility. Seller financing felt like jumping through hoops with all the legal stuff—way more than I expected. If you’re on a tight budget or fixing credit, lease-to-own buys you breathing room without as much up-front hassle.


Reply
sculptor55
Posts: 15
(@sculptor55)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from, but I’ve seen seller financing work out smoother than lease-to-own in some cases—especially when buyers are serious about locking in a price. Had a client last year who went lease-to-own, only to find out the seller changed their mind right before the purchase window. Talk about heartbreak and wasted moving boxes. Seller financing can feel like paperwork city, but at least you know where you stand once it’s all signed. Sometimes that extra legal stuff is worth the headache.


Reply
Posts: 3
(@dthomas11)
New Member
Joined:

Funny timing—just had a deal fall apart last month because the lease-to-own seller got cold feet. All that time, money, and stress, and my client ended up back at square one. I get that seller financing can be a paperwork slog, but at least you’re not left wondering if the rug’s gonna get pulled out from under you. Still, I’ve seen lease-to-own work when both parties are super committed... just feels like there’s more room for surprises, y’know?


Reply
shadowblogger
Posts: 18
(@shadowblogger)
Active Member
Joined:

Seller financing just feels less risky, honestly. I got burned on a lease-to-own a couple years ago—seller backed out right before we were set to close and I lost months of time (not to mention a chunk of cash I’ll never see again). At least with seller financing, once it’s signed, you’re locked in. The paperwork’s a pain, sure, but I’d rather deal with that than play the waiting game hoping nobody gets cold feet. Lease-to-own sounds flexible, but in my experience, it’s just more uncertainty.


Reply
Page 15 / 40
Share:
Scroll to Top