Notifications
Clear all

Does an old bankruptcy matter more than a recent one?

319 Posts
309 Users
0 Reactions
5,465 Views
film829
Posts: 1
(@film829)
New Member
Joined:

Title: Does an old bankruptcy matter more than a recent one?

I get where you’re coming from, but in my experience, lenders are way more forgiving about an old bankruptcy than a fresh one. Sure, they’ll ask for paperwork—lenders love their paperwork—but if it’s been discharged for years and your credit’s bounced back, it’s usually not a dealbreaker. I’ve seen folks with a 7-year-old bankruptcy get approved while someone with a recent one gets the door politely shut in their face. Guess it’s like dating... time heals most things, but some red flags stick around longer than others.


Reply
michaelh86
Posts: 12
(@michaelh86)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, I’ve been wondering about this too since I’m in the early stages of trying to buy my first place. My partner had a bankruptcy about 6 years ago, and we were honestly worried it would totally ruin our chances. But when we finally worked up the nerve to talk to a mortgage broker, they seemed way less concerned than we expected. They mostly cared about what we’d done since then—like rebuilding credit and not missing payments.

I get nervous every time we have to fill out another form or explain something from the past, but it seems like as long as you can show you’ve learned from it, lenders are willing to look past old stuff. Still, I do wonder if different lenders have different “expiration dates” for red flags like bankruptcy... or if it’s just a case-by-case thing.

Anyway, definitely feels like time makes a difference, but I guess there’s always that little bit of anxiety until you actually get approved.


Reply
athlete26
Posts: 10
(@athlete26)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve always wondered how much of this is just down to the specific lender you end up with. When I refinanced a couple years back, I had a ding on my credit from a medical bill that went to collections (total mess—insurance mix-up, not even my fault), and one lender basically acted like it was the end of the world. Another barely blinked as long as everything else looked solid and I could explain it.

With bankruptcy, I’d imagine it’s even more subjective. Some places probably have those hard-and-fast rules—like “must be X years since discharge”—but others seem to treat it more like a gray area, especially if you’ve got a good story and your recent history is clean. It’s weirdly inconsistent.

Has anyone actually seen a list or chart from a lender showing their “expiration dates” for stuff like this? Or is it all just buried in their internal guidelines? I feel like brokers sometimes gloss over the details unless you really press them for specifics.

Also, does the type of bankruptcy matter? Like, is Chapter 7 treated differently than Chapter 13 when you’re applying for a mortgage six or seven years later? I’ve heard mixed things—some say lenders are stricter with one than the other, but then again, maybe that’s just internet rumor.

I get what you mean about the anxiety too. Even after getting approved, there’s always that nagging feeling something from years ago could pop up and derail everything at the last minute... Maybe that’s just me being paranoid, but it seems like these systems are set up to keep us guessing.


Reply
wildlife826
Posts: 13
(@wildlife826)
Active Member
Joined:

“Has anyone actually seen a list or chart from a lender showing their ‘expiration dates’ for stuff like this? Or is it all just buried in their internal guidelines?”

Honestly, it’s almost always buried. Lenders have those published minimums—like FHA loans needing 2 years post-Chapter 7 discharge—but the reality is, their “overlays” (basically extra rules) can vary a lot. I wouldn’t count on a broker to spell it out unless you ask directly, and even then, loan officers sometimes just don’t know until underwriting.

On Chapter 7 vs. 13, there actually *are* differences. Some lenders are stricter with Chapter 7 because it’s a full discharge, while Chapter 13 shows you tried to pay back at least part of your debts. But after enough time passes (like 7+ years), the distinction tends to matter less—credit reestablishment and your recent history become way more important.

And that anxiety about something popping up last minute? Not just you… I’ve seen deals fall apart over decade-old stuff that no one flagged until final underwriting. Always good to double-check your credit reports before you get too far down the road.


Reply
nwilson14
Posts: 12
(@nwilson14)
Active Member
Joined:

Title: Does an old bankruptcy matter more than a recent one?

Honestly, I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve thought a deal was wrapped up, only for some ancient bankruptcy or collection to pop up in the 11th hour. Lenders love their secret sauce—half the time, even the loan officer is just guessing what underwriting will flag. I’ve seen a 10-year-old Chapter 7 get more scrutiny than a 3-year-old Chapter 13, just because someone in compliance got nervous. It’s wild. If you’re not combing through your own credit reports with a magnifying glass, you’re basically rolling the dice.


Reply
Page 61 / 64
Share:
Scroll to Top